voidly
Honest comparison·Voidly vs OONI

Voidly vs OONI

OONI runs the probes and publishes the raw data. Voidly aggregates, classifies, and indexes it. We are downstream of OONI, not a replacement.

Voidly is built on top of OONI data — they are an upstream source, not a competitor. We credit OONI in every dataset, page, and incident citation. For raw probe measurements and methodology, go to ooni.org directly.

Side by side

yes~ partial no not applicable

Feature
Voidly
OONI
  • Probe network
    ~
    37+ nodes (volunteer + Vultr core)
    240+ countries, mass volunteer probes
  • Raw measurements
    Aggregated only — not a probe network
    2.2B+ raw measurements
  • Methodology rigor
    ~
    Inherits OONI + adds ML classification
    Peer-reviewed, gold standard
  • Data sources
    OONI + CensoredPlanet + IODA + Citizen Lab
    ~
    OONI Probe network only
  • Citable incident IDs
    IR-2026-0142 format, 5,356 incidents
    Per-measurement only
  • ML classification
    GradientBoosting F1 99.8%
    Heuristic anomaly detection
  • AI/MCP integration
    @voidly/mcp-server, 83 tools
    No MCP server
  • REST API
    api.voidly.ai with auth + free tier
    api.ooni.io aggregation API
  • Open source
    ~
    SDK + MCP open, backend mixed
    Fully open source
  • Non-profit
    For-profit, free tier + paid API
    Non-profit, no commercial product
  • Years of data
    ~
    10-year OONI archive (1.6M records)
    Since 2012, 14+ years
  • Real-time alerts
    Webhooks, RSS, MCP, Sentinel forecasts
    ~
    OONI Run, no webhook subscriptions

We don't color-code "winners." Decide for yourself which tool fits your use case.

What OONI does well

OONI (Open Observatory of Network Interference) is the foundational organization for empirical internet censorship measurement. They have run a global probe network since 2012 with over 2.2 billion measurements collected from volunteers in 240+ countries. Their methodology is rigorous, peer-reviewed, fully open-source (Probe app, Explorer, all backend tools), and their MAT (Measurement Aggregation Toolkit) is the standard reference for academic researchers. The OONI Explorer is the canonical place to view raw test results — anyone can drill down to a specific measurement and see the exact DNS resolution, TCP handshake, and HTTP response captured at the moment of testing. OONI is a non-profit and their data is the bedrock that every serious censorship researcher (including Voidly) relies on.

Visit OONI

What Voidly does differently

Voidly is an aggregation, classification, and indexing layer downstream of OONI. We ingest OONI's aggregation API every 6 hours alongside CensoredPlanet (Satellite + Hyperquack), IODA, Citizen Lab category mapping, and our own probe network. Where OONI publishes measurements, we publish incidents — clusters of measurements grouped into citable events with hash IDs (e.g. IR-2026-0142), ML-derived confidence scores, and structured evidence permalinks. We expose this as REST APIs, an MCP server, RSS feeds, BibTeX citations, and webhook subscriptions. We are optimized for AI agents and downstream applications; OONI is optimized for measurement integrity and researcher access. Different layers of the stack.

How we measure →API docs →

When to use which

Specific scenarios. Not all of them point to Voidly — that's on purpose.

  • Scenario
    Academic paper on a specific censorship event
    Recommendation
    Start with Voidly to identify the incident (IR-2026-0142), then drill into OONI Explorer for the underlying raw measurements. Cite OONI for the data, Voidly for the classification.
  • Scenario
    Building an AI agent that needs to know "is X blocked in Y?"
    Recommendation
    Use Voidly MCP server. We pre-aggregate OONI + 3 other sources and expose them as 83 MCP tools. OONI does not have an MCP server.
  • Scenario
    Running new probe measurements on a specific URL
    Recommendation
    Use OONI Probe (the app). Voidly does not run probes on demand — we consume aggregated probe data from OONI and others.
  • Scenario
    Volunteer-running a probe to contribute measurements
    Recommendation
    Install OONI Probe. Their volunteer network is far larger than Voidly's probe nodes. (Voidly accepts probe contributions but OONI is the right entry point.)
  • Scenario
    Adding citable evidence to a journalism article
    Recommendation
    Use Voidly incident hash IDs (IR-2026-0142). Each links to evidence permalinks that cite the upstream OONI/CensoredPlanet/IODA measurements. Both are credited.

Together better

Voidly users should also use OONI. If you find an interesting incident in Voidly, the next step is usually to drill into OONI Explorer for the raw measurement data. Every Voidly incident links back to the underlying OONI measurements where applicable. We push researchers toward OONI for serious investigations — they are the source.

Try Voidly free

Read endpoints are free, no key required. CC BY 4.0 licensed. For higher rate limits and ML/forecast endpoints, get an API key.

Other comparisons

Comparison published in good faith. Cite as https://voidly.ai/vs/ooni