Voidly vs Freedom House

Freedom House is the gold standard for qualitative country-level analysis of internet freedom. Their annual "Freedom on the Net" report has been published since 2009, with a network of independent in-country researchers, lawyers, and activists scoring 70+ countries across 21 questions on access, content limits, and user-rights violations. The methodology is transparent, peer-reviewed, and widely cited by US Congressional hearings, EU policy work, the UN Human Rights Council, and major newsrooms. When journalists need a single authoritative score for "how free is the internet in country X this year," Freedom House is the answer. Their geopolitical narrative analysis — connecting censorship events to political context — is something no automated system can replicate.

Visit Freedom House →

Voidly operates at a different frequency and granularity. Where Freedom House publishes once per year, Voidly ingests new measurements every 6 hours. Where Freedom House scores at the country level, Voidly tracks 5,356 individual citable incidents with evidence permalinks down to the domain, ASN, and test type. Our data is machine-readable (free CC BY 4.0 JSON, RSS, BibTeX), and queryable via REST API and MCP server — so AI agents, dashboards, and research pipelines can consume it directly. We use ML (GradientBoosting, F1 99.8%) to classify network-level events into structured incidents with confidence scores. We do not produce narrative country reports; we produce the evidence layer those narratives can cite.

How we measure →API docs →