The full narrative is unavailable.
The original evidence text could not be loaded. Use the source record below; availability of linked files is checked separately.
Open the original HTML fileAll findingsPublished research
Voidly ResearchPublished
Impact-aware active-learning ranker: uncertainty × volume × drift
The active-learning queue used to rank candidates by |p − 0.5| alone (uncertainty sampling, Lewis 1994). It treated a Mali day with 1 measurement the same as an Iran day with 762. The new default ranking is a 3-factor product — uncertainty × log-volume × DBSCAN drift — heuristic Estimated Error…
Read the full published summary
The active-learning queue used to rank candidates by |p − 0.5| alone (uncertainty sampling, Lewis 1994). It treated a Mali day with 1 measurement the same as an Iran day with 762. The new default ranking is a 3-factor product — uncertainty × log-volume × DBSCAN drift — heuristic Estimated Error Reduction in the spirit of Settles 2009. Toggle back to the old ranking via ?rank_by=uncertainty. Live at /v1/sentinel/active-learning-queue.
The source record.
Original source links and labels. Linked responses may have changed since publication.