What we found

The strongest lead/lag pairs in the past 365 days are concentrated in two regions: the Gulf states (SA, AE, QA, BH cross-correlate at ±1 day, suggesting near-simultaneous regional patterns just under the lag-zero floor) and a Middle East → Central Asia chain (AE → SA → TH → KZ pattern at +1 day, IQ → KZ at +26 days, MA → IR at +15 days). The Asian cluster (UZ → PK → AZ at ±1–2 days) is the densest sub-graph: Uzbekistan’s daily censorship pattern leads Pakistan by 1 day with r=+0.89, and Pakistan in turn leads Tanzania by up to 30 days with r=+0.72.

What this means — and what it does not

Cross-correlation is descriptive, not causal. Three plausible explanations for any significant lead/lag pair:

Distinguishing these three is what the Atlas case studies pipeline is for — each significant pair here is a candidate for a deeper write-up that pulls in incident metadata, ASN overlap, and the political event calendar.

How to read the table

A row UZ → PK lag=1d r=+0.89 reads: when Uzbekistan’s daily citable-censorship count spikes, Pakistan’s count spikes one day later, and the Pearson correlation between the two smoothed series (UZ today vs. PK tomorrow) is 0.89 over the overlap window. The FDR-adjusted p-value tells you how unlikely that pattern is under the null of two independent random walks given that we tested 1,225 pairs × 60 lags = 73,500 hypotheses.

Where this fits in the Atlas

/atlas/correlation-matrix answers “which countries co-move today?” /atlas/cohorts answers “which countries have similarly shaped 365-day patterns under time warping?” This page answers the third question: “which country’s pattern reliably precedes another’s by N days?” — the predictive-signal axis that would let an analyst, on seeing a spike in country A, raise the alert level for the countries that historically follow it.